RILKE
Hi, ya'all ~ Rilke’s Great, Huh -- Here's a copy of The LOVE Daylong Retreat Readings
at ATS this past Saturday + some more of Rilke's confrontive thoughts that
we just didn't get to... Please forward it to all the retreat meditators who attended and anyone else....
I for one, am so happy we sat meditation
together, breathed together and had some Good Loving
Wisdom Dharma conversation... Together ~A~
___________________
Rainer Maria Rilke, (1875-1926) the world-renown
German existential philosopher, poet and author of "On
Love & Other Difficulties" and "Letters to a
Young Poet"-- Highly mature, sobering letters and
poems on love - show Rilke's profound understanding of men and women
and his ardent spirituality. His radical books, were written over ninety years
ago in the avant-garde' bohemian Paris of Picasso. Rilke
introduces the contradictory concept of solitude as a blessing. He
seems to have this way of reaching into your inner-soul and grabbing ahold of
'your reality' and making you face it, in a tone of controlled
urgency, in an exhorting, passionate sort of way. Experimental openness
to experience, on comprehending what is most difficult - and turning what
is most alien into that which we can most trust
....
~ John J. L. Mood
________________
Excerpts from "ON LOVE & OTHER
DIFFICULTIES"
(1908 ) by
Rainer Rilke -- some deep comprehension-reading ~ certainly not for
lovers of the naive ...a Rilke fan favorite…
" For, since it lies
in the nature of indifference or
insecurity of the common crowd to
recognize no solitude – then love
and friendship are specifically there for the
purpose of continually providing the ‘opportunity’ for
solitude. And only love and friendship are the “true sharing’s”
which do rhythmically interrupt our individual periods of deep solitary
emotion.
A merging, a true
and absolute togetherness between two people is an impossibility –and where it does seem to
exist nevertheless – it IS still a narrowing, a hemming-in, a
mutually-compromised-consent – that
really does limit one party or both of their fullest freedom
and development. But once the realization is accepted - that even between the closest people, infinite distance continues to exist – a wonderful living side-by-side can then grow up for them - IF they succeed in loving the expanse, loving the distance between them – which gives them the possibility of always seeing each other as a whole being before an immense wide sky ! "
"On Love &
Other Difficulties" ~ the above was adapted, added to, and
edited by Akasa Levi from Translations and Considerations of
Rainier Maria Rilke by John Mood; W.W. Norton, 1975 and The
Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke by Stephen Mitchell
& Robert Hass; Vintage, 1989 - both as translated from Rilke’s
original German editions.
|
~ and most famously avant garde’
Rilke's "Letters to a Young
Poet" (1903-1908)
" Be patient toward all
that is unsolved in your own heart
Try to love the 'Questions'
themselves - like locked room
and like books that are written in a
foreign language
Do not right now,
seek for the Answers.
The 'Answers' which cannot now be
given to you -
Because you would not be able
to live them.
And the point is to live everything
-
Experiencing everything
At present, you need to
live the Questions.
Perhaps you will gradually,
without even noticing it, live along
some
distant day into the true Answer. Your answer."
|
Of course –– If you want some more Rilke – read further
on ~
" Love is the only sane
and satisfactory answer
to the problem of
human existence." ~ Erich Fromm
___________________________
....more Rilke on personal Solitude
".... and Love being so Difficult.
Love Full with Immature Expectations
=equally=
Love Discourages with
Disappointments
<> People
have, with the sad help of naïve
common 'conventions', totally
oriented
all their solutions toward the easy,
and toward the easiest side of the easy
--but it is so
painfully clear today that
we must also relate to what is Difficult.
We must be highly mature to be creative:
contradictions of Solitude as a Blessing.
--for Solitude is
enticingly Difficult.
That something is
Difficult must be
a reason
the more for us to do it."
___________________
<> To Love is Good - Love
being so difficult. For one human being to love another - that is
perhaps the most difficult of all our
life-tasks – the 'Ultimate Work' for which all other work is but
preparation. For this reason young people, who are beginners in
everything, cannot yet 'know' love: they have to learn it. To
practice it. With their whole being, with
all their vital forces, gathered close in around their lonely, timid, upward-beating
heart, they must learn to love. But 'learning-time' is also always a
long, secluded alone-time. So being 'loving' is solitude itself - for
a long while ahead and far into life – it is an intensified and deepened
loving-aloneness for she or he who Loves.
<> Love is at first not anything that means 'merging', giving over and uniting with another - for what would an
authentic ‘union’ be of something unclarified and unfinished? Love
is a high inducement to the individual to fully ripen, to
become 'whole' for themselves for another's sake. Love is a great exacting
claim upon you, something that chooses you out and
calls you to vast things. Only by the task of working on
themselves - might young people use the
love that is given them. Merging, surrendering and every kind of communion
is not yet for them - who must save and gather-in for a long, long
time still.
<> Whoever looks seriously at 'Love', finds that love and other difficulties of the heart, haven't
any explanation, any solution, any hint of a ‘way’ yet to be
discerned. Love is a ‘problem’ that we carry wrapped up & hand on without
opening - and as beginners we are not up to it. Instead of
losing ourselves in love, in all the light and frivolous play - behind which
people have hidden from their existences - but instead, we must hold off
and take this Love upon us as an apprenticeship.
~ Rainer Maria
Rilke
_______________________________
Rilke in 1905, far
ahead of his time --
a very early 'feminist-male' thinker,
went on to
say ~
. . . But this is what
'young people' are so often and so disastrously wrong in doing – they
( who by their very nature are impatient ) fling themselves at each other when love
takes hold of them, they scatter themselves, just as they are, in all their messiness, disorder,
bewilderment. . . And what can happen then? What can life do with
this heap of half-broken things that they call their 'communion' and that they
would like to call their happiness, if that were possible, and their
future?
. . . And so each of them loses himself or herself for the sake of
the 'other' person – and loses the other, and then many
others who still wanted to come. And loses the
vast distances and possibilities, gives up the approaching and fleeing of
gentle, prescient Things in exchange for an unfruitful
confusion, out of which nothing more can come. Nothing but a bit
of disgust, disappointment, and poverty, and the escape into one of the many
'conventions' that have been put up in great numbers like public shelters
on this most dangerous road. No area of human experience is
so extensively provided with conventions as this one is:
there are 'live-preservers' of the most varied invention, boats and water
wings. Society has been able to create refuges of every sort -- for since it
preferred to take the "Love-Life" as an amusement – it
also had to give it an easy form, cheap, safe, and
sure, as popular public amusements are. ( Britney, Paris )
<> It is true that many young people who "love falsely" for instance simply surrendering themselves and
giving up their solitude. The average person will of
course, always go on doing that. And feel oppressed by their
own failure and want to make the situation they have landed in livable and
fruitful in their own, personal way. For their nature tells them
that the Questions of 'Love' - even more than everything else
that is important – cannot be resolved publicly and according to this
or that agreement.
<> That there are 'Questions',
intimate questions from one human being to another - which in any case
require a new, special, wholly personal answer. But
How can they, who have already flung themselves together - and
can no longer tell whose outlines are whose? Who thus no longer possess anything of their own. How
can they find a way 'out of themselves', out of the depths of their
already buried solitude?
<> They act out of 'mutual helplessness', and then if, whit the best of intentions, they try to escape the
'conventions' that are approaching them ( marriage, for example ), they fall
into the clutches of some less obvious but just as deadly conventional
solution. For then, everything around them ~ is
convention. Wherever people act out of a prematurely fused, muddy communion, every 'action' is
conventional. Every 'relation' that such confusion leads to -
has its own convention, however unusual in the ordinary sense of immoral
it may be. Even 'separating' would be a conventional step, an impersonal,
accidental decision without strength and without fruit.
<> Whoever looks seriously will find that ~
neither for 'Death', which is difficult, nor for 'Difficult Love' has any clarification, any solution, any hint
of a Path been perceived. And for both these tasks – which we carry
wrapped up and hand-on without opening, there is not a
general, agreed-upon rule that can be discovered. But
in the same measure in which we begin to test Life as 'individuals' – these Great
Things will come to meet us, the individuals, with greater intimacy. The
claims that the "Difficult Work of Love" makes 'upon our development
are greater than life' - and we, as beginners, are just not equal
to them. But if we nevertheless Endure and
take this Love upon us as 'Burden' and 'Apprenticeship' - instead of losing
ourselves in the whole easy and frivolous game behind which people have hidden
from the most solemn solemnity of their Being. Then "a
small advance" and a "lightening" will
perhaps be perceptible to those who come long after us. That would be much.
<> We are only just now beginning to consider the relation of
One Individual to a Second Individual 'objectively' and without prejudice. And our attempts to
"live such relationships" have no model before
them. And yet in the changes that Time has brought about -
there are already many things that can now help
our timid novitiate.<> The Girl and the Woman, in their new, individual unfolding - will only in passing be imitators of male behavior and misbehavior and repeaters of male professions. After the 'uncertainty' of such transitions, it will become obvious that women were going through the abundance and variation of those - often ridiculous – 'disguises' just so that they could purify their own essential nature and wash out the deforming influences of the male-sex. Women, in whom "Life" itself lingers and dwells more immediately, more fruitfully, and more confidently, must surely have become riper and more human in their depths…
~ Rainer Maria
Rilke
Please do no t overlook the fact that Rilke's writings go back two centuries and are dated 1908 -- more than 100+ years ago -- really some literate emotional, pioneer thinking here !
--- end
Please do no t overlook the fact that Rilke's writings go back two centuries and are dated 1908 -- more than 100+ years ago -- really some literate emotional, pioneer thinking here !
--- end
No comments:
Post a Comment